|Overall Rating||Liked it!|
|Riding Style||All Mountain Freestyle|
|Riding Level||Beginner - Expert|
|Fits Boot size (US)||8-10, 10-12|
|Manufactured in||USA by Never Summer|
|Camber Profile||Hybrid Rocker|
|Approx. Weight||Feels Normal|
|On Snow Feel|
Where To Buy
No obligation, but these links & ads support the site.
Never Summer Warlock 2019 - 2017 Review by The Good Ride
The Never Summer Warlock is a lot like NS said. It has a lot of personalities from the discontinued NS Proto and to a lesser extent the Evo. We would say it’s like a more floaty Proto. We liked the Warlock but felt it didn’t have as much to offer as the extra camber Proto Type II for all-mountain freestyle riding. It did have a nice take on the old Proto except it floated better.
Ethics Statement: We don’t get paid by the manufacturer to write these reviews. We do make money from the “Where To Buy” links, but this is our best attempt at an honest and objective review from an average riders’ perspective.
Conditions: Pretty good powder but not that deep and good mid-winter snow.
Riders: James (Size 9, 5’10” 185-195lbs)
Boots: Adidas Tactical ADV
Insoles: Sandsole Custom Insoles, Footprint Insole Technology Gameghangers Low Profile
Bindings: Union Atlas, Union Superpro, Burton Genesis
Set Up: 22.5” Centered 15 front -15 back
Never Summer Warlock Past Reviews
At the demo, we heard this was a replacement to the Evo so we got a 154 and compared it to the Funslinger in the video. However, now that I have the Warlock Specs it’s much closer to the old Proto and a 157 would have been best. So in the written review, I compare it more to the Proto and Proto Type Two.
Conditions: Very good Sierra Snow
Riders: James, Peter, Jimbo, Kyle,
Boots: Burton SLX, Burton AMB, Nike Kaiju,
Bindings: Union Ultra
Set Up: Centered 15 front -15 back approx 23″ wide
Approximate Weight: Felt normal and very well made.
On Snow Feel: The Warlock has the old rocker and camber profile is fun and familiar but since the Ripsaw camber profile came out it seems to be missing something. Still, it’s not super washy or squirrely when one footing and flat basing. It doesn’t have the stability of the Funslinger or Proto Type Two but it’s not bad for a hybrid rocker. It gets a little loose between the feet in the hard snow and prefers you to always be on edge.
Edge Hold: Same great edge hold we have liked over the years with NS. Grips well enough to not slide out underfoot in hard snow but you have to dial back how much you commit the edge to the board. In medium to soft snow it’s great.
Flex: Really good flex that’s much stiffer to bend for a butter than the Funslinger but to us felt a touch softer than the Proto Type Two. Yeah, I think it’s closest to the NS Proto. I think Peter’s knee was bothering him that day.
Turn Initiation: It’s pretty quick edge to edge. Again we liked ripsaw camber better but this mellower elliptical camber is far from lifeless.
Skidded Turns: Great board for those that aren’t always making good turns. It lets you fuck up a lot without making you pay for it like you use to with old camber boards 10+ years ago.
Carving: Not a dynamic carver but good enough to rail a turn but not really as fun as the Proto Type Two
Powder: No powder but with that mellow hybrid rocker profile and that big tip/tail it should float well for a twin with a centered stance. It seems close to the Proto Type II but maybe a touch better because of that big ass nose/tail. I’d like to take it out in around 1 foot of powder with the Type Two and see how they compare.
Speed: Pretty stable at speed and good for its size. The 157 would of been great to try instead and I think it would of been as fast as the old Proto and almost as fast as the Proto Type Two which feels a little more stable than both.
Uneven Terrain: Same great NS ability to handle messy resort snow and bumps like a champ.
Switch: Very good each way. As good as the Proto but not the Proto Type Two due to the Asymmetrical side cuts.
Jibbing: A little stiff in the middle compared to the Funslinger so not ideal to jib but doable.
Pipe: The Same theme goes here. It’s going to be a fun pipe board but
Jumps: A few years ago the Proto to us was a top-notch jump board but now that technology has changed and the Proto Type Two is out there with more camber/pop it’s just not as appealing. The Warlock has a lot of similarities to the old Proto so it doesn’t quite have the appeal it would of a few years back. Stil,l it’s a good board to hit kickers with.
So all in all it’s a fun board but it kind of reminds us of a Proto with a big tip/tail. So the Never Summer Warlock would of been a great board a few years back but the recent changes to hybrid rocker it’s just not as dynamic in the here and now.
Never Summer Warlock Specs
Never Summer Warlock Images
Never Summer Company Information
Never Summer Warlock User Reviews
Really good board
I own this board and the Proto Type Two. I have to agree that the PT2 is more fun, but this is still a really fun ride too. If the PT2 is a 10/10, I would give the Warlock an 8/10. It would be interesting to see how the Warlock would stack up to the PT2 if NS gave it the Ripsaw camber profile. That being said, this is a great board for riding switch. The soft flex of the board transmits wicked terrain feedback, which is very beneficial to developing your switch riding skills.